Skip to main content
Backed byY CombinatorSoma Capital

MindFort vs Escape

Escape is a strong choice for APIs and GraphQL. Its business-logic-aware DAST tests every GraphQL query, mutation, and resolver. Its AI pentesting turns findings into regression tests in CI. MindFort tests web apps and APIs alongside endpoints, network, cloud, and infrastructure. It writes the patch and opens the pull request itself, from $199/mo.

How MindFort compares to Escape on findings and remediation

MindFort vs Escape, head to head

MindFort
Escape

Fully autonomous

Yes
Yes

White-box testing

Yes
Yes

Black-box testing

Yes
Yes

Pricing

Starting at $199/mo

From $50,000/yr

Remediation guidance

Yes
Yes

Opens patch PR

Yes
No

PR security review

Yes
Yes

Time to first results

Hours

Hours

Web

Yes
Yes

API

Yes
Yes

Code

Yes
Yes

Endpoints

Yes

Unknown

Network

Yes
Yes

Cloud

Yes

Unknown

Infra

Yes
Yes

Business logic

Yes
Yes

CI/CD integration

Yes
Yes

GitHub integration

Yes
Yes

Jira integration

Yes
Yes

Linear integration

Yes

Unknown

Slack integration

Yes
Yes

Every competitor cell comes from that vendor’s own site, docs, or announcements, verified between July and October 2026. “Unknown” means the vendor does not state it publicly.

Built for teams that ship fast

Continuous, exploitation-based testing that keeps pace with your releases.

Hours

First Results

24/7

Coverage

<1%

False Positives

Minutes

Setup

Deploy your autonomous security agents today.

Deploy autonomous security agents that continuously pen test, prove every vulnerability with a working proof of concept, and ship the patch.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about MindFort and Escape.

Yes. Both run autonomous agents that chain multi-step attacks on web apps and APIs to prove exploitability, even white-box with your source code attached. The biggest difference is the fix: Escape hands the finding to your coding agent. MindFort writes the patch and opens the pull request itself.

If GraphQL is most of your attack surface, yes. Escape built a scanner native to GraphQL that tests every query, mutation, and resolver. It also maintains GraphQL Armor, an open-source GraphQL security project. MindFort tests APIs as part of a broader pentest across apps, network, cloud, and infrastructure.

It writes the remediation and leaves the patch to your coding agent. Escape's docs say it doesn't generate a patch in the dashboard. Each issue gets a short remediation and a Fix in Cursor button that sends the finding to Cursor, Claude Code, or Codex as a prompt. MindFort writes the patch, opens the pull request, and retests once the fix ships.

Yes, with documented setups for GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure, CircleCI, Jenkins, and others. Escape also turns pentest findings into regression tests that run on every build. Its notification docs cover Jira, Slack, and Microsoft Teams. MindFort connects to GitHub, Jira, Linear, and Slack.

Escape's pricing page asks you to talk to its team. As of October 2026, its own AWS Marketplace listing shows Enterprise plans from $50,000 a year for up to 15 apps. MindFort starts at $199/mo on a self-serve plan.