More capable than Mythos
Mythos reads your source code to flag risky patterns. MindFort tests your running application, validating every vulnerability with a working proof of concept and opening the patch PR.
Head to head
MindFort vs Mythos, head to head
Mythos reads source code to flag risky patterns. MindFort tests the running application, proves vulnerabilities by exploiting them, and opens the patch PR for confirmed findings.
Primary approach
Autonomous pentest
Static code analysis
White-box testing
Black-box testing
Tests the running application
Validated by real exploitation
Proof of exploit per finding
Business-logic testing
Limited
Chained / multi-step attacks
Auto-remediation / patching
Opens fix PRs
Flags only
False-positive handling
Proven by exploit
Pattern-based
Static code analysis (SAST)
Web
API
Network
Cloud
Time to first results
Hours
Hours
Pricing
From $1,000/mo
Custom
CI/CD integration
Native
Yes
GitHub integration
Jira integration
Linear integration
Slack integration
Why teams switch
Built for teams that ship fast
Continuous, exploitation-based testing that keeps pace with your releases.
Hours
First Results
24/7
Coverage
<1%
False Positives
Minutes
Setup
Deploy an autonomous security team today.
Deploy an autonomous red team that validates every vulnerability with a working proof of concept and ships the patch.
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about MindFort and Mythos.
They solve different problems. Mythos performs static code analysis, reading source code to flag risky patterns. MindFort is an autonomous pentester that tests your running application and proves vulnerabilities by exploiting them, then opens a patch pull request.
Mythos analyzes code at rest. MindFort tests the application at runtime, where real attackers operate. That means MindFort can confirm exploitability, test business logic, and chain vulnerabilities across the running system.
MindFort focuses on runtime, exploitation-based pentesting rather than static code scanning. It complements a SAST tool: MindFort proves and fixes what is actually exploitable in the live application.
Yes. Static analysis catches certain code-level patterns early, while MindFort validates real, exploitable risk at runtime and opens patch pull requests for confirmed findings.